Received: from relay1.UU.NET (relay1.UU.NET [192.48.96.5]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id BAA04200 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 01:03:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzzsh11744; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:54:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA05446; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:53:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:53:19 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <310473E1.6B26@inf.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Terry Mundy <tmundy@inf.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Slow LW 4.0/4.1 for Amiga
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Robert Cohen wrote:
>
> >NewTek needs to address this speed problem. I may just use the cash
> >put aside for the Flyer to switch to a Pentium. This would cost NewTek
> >a Flyer sale, as I would get a PVR instead. Can NewTek afford the loss
> >if all the Amiga owners felt the same way?
>
> I think that most pro LW users WILL feel the same way... I myself am steering
> clear of 4.0 for those very reasons.. I think that NewTek must already
> realize this, which would explain thier lack of enthusiasm for the Amiga
> platform... Besides, for every Amgia user that goes Pentium, there is an
> additional sale on their end... (usually).
What if this was NewTek's idea in the first place, designed to force us Amiga users to
the PC platform. It's not hard for me to believe that such an idea (conspirecy) ever
existed.
I too will not purchase the new upgrade. I will take the wait and see attitude also.